Home Forum Contact Create an Account Sign In Create a Trust

Three Arck Successes

This topic contains 19 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by Avatar of ahutton ahutton 9 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • Author
  • #34004
    Avatar of buzzbox

    Hey Cork,

    Maybe the Wiz has the right approach – wear them down, while attacking “Standing”.

    Fundamentally, all the programs seem to come down to that in the end. Once you’ve identified the fraud and the mishandled paperwork or lack thereof, and initiated the action, just plan on a long drawn out process. If it eventually comes down to it, work it on through the courts until a settlement is reached. It’s an enormous amount of work and exercise for the brain cells.

    I’m confident that the pretender lenders are also learning from those who are fighting with them and using whatever techiques they have discovered to slow the process down. Who can out-wait the other.

    Maybe after the data is collected we should simply go for Quiet Title to make sure we’ve got their attention.

    Avatar of corkhorner

    The Wiz ‘ain’t no dummy.

    As to quiet title actions who/where has that succeeded? i know its a concept.

    As to the lenders/banks utilizing a martial arts technique—yes—they and their lawyers learned the court game fast.

    I’ve been an originagtor and cobene on 2 3arcks about 1.5 years.

    An interesting observation about lawyers is they don’t really care which side they argue just so they get paid. That’s their training.

    c h

    Avatar of scott_l._moyes

    QTA is not a Concept, it is a Lawsuit and when combined with the proper docs and EVIDENCE, WILL result in a lien release. QTA is the final step that every successful attorney uses in court. I have personal knowledge of this.

    However, without the proper evidence, a QTA is useless. You can’t just file a QTA and expect the court to do all work for you. You dave three choices, hire an attorney and hope they are educated on the securitization process etc., do it your self and hope you don’t screw up, or work with a partner that has extensive knowledge, success and experience.

    Avatar of mtnwizard

    That’s easy — most attorneys are clueless and overcharge. I’ll continue to do it myself. I figure I have less chance of screwing up and more interest in success than anyone else re my case. I also care more about it. :D

    Avatar of dave salcido
    dave salcido

    Sadly Doc, pro se seems to be the option of necessity. Attorneys would be more active in this arena if it didn’t require so much time and energy to learn and apply the arguments associated with mortgage securitization fraud and quiet title. Except for the class action guys, I wonder how many attorneys are even smart enough litigate such an issue.

    Avatar of mtnwizard

    Very few. I interviewed at least a dozen and only one had the level of understanding necessary to deal with the banks in court. Unfortunately he wanted $5K retainer and $250 an hour. I’ll keep plodding along…

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Posted in
Contact Form
Your Fullname:

Email Address:


Best Time to Call:


Your Message:

Security Code:


Can't read the above security code? Refresh